Smiles affect response to stress

At a Glance

  • In a study of men who were stressed by having to give short speeches, seeing different types of smiles affected the men’s stress responses differently.
  • The findings open the door to further study of the nuanced ways that nonverbal cues affect human social interactions.
Sample smiles
Screenshots of the different smiles used in the study: “reward” (top), “affiliation” (middle), “dominance” (bottom).Martin et al., University of Wisconsin–Madison

Many people find it stressful to be in situations where other people are judging them, such as public speaking. During such situations, we produce steroid hormones called glucocorticoids that affect many systems throughout the body. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis—a network involving the hypothalamus and pituitary gland in the brain and the adrenal glands near the kidneys—plays a central role in these effects.

A team led by Jared Martin and Dr. Paula Niedenthal at the University of Wisconsin–Madison investigated whether the HPA axis responds to nonverbal feedback, such as facial expressions. Past work from the team identified the characteristics of at least three distinct types of genuine, spontaneous smiles. Each one serves a different social function. “Reward” smiles show happiness and reinforce behavior, “affiliation” smiles strengthen social bonds between people, and “dominance” smiles are derisive and signal feelings of superior social status. The researchers tested how these different smiles affect HPA axis activity.

The team recruited 90 male college students. The men were asked to give three short speeches about themselves in front of a male evaluator who was watching over a web camera. In fact, the evaluator only briefly appeared live, then turned off his camera. After each of the three speeches, the participants were shown videos of their evaluator’s facial expressions. They were told these represented spontaneous reactions, but the videos were actually pre-recorded. The men were shown one reward, affiliation, or dominance smile after each of their responses. Each time, they were also shown a control video with a neutral response, such as face scratching or eye blinks.

The scientists measured levels of the glucocorticoid cortisol in the men’s saliva. They also used an electrocardiograph before, during, and after the speech to measure heart activity. The study was funded in part by NIH’s National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Results were published in Scientific Reports on March 1, 2018.

The team found that dominance smiles increased levels of cortisol and heart rates. Reward and affiliation smiles, in contrast, tended to buffer the effects of stress. Participants receiving reward or affiliation smiles returned to their base cortisol levels within 30 minutes after their speech, while those who received dominance smiles continued to have significantly higher cortisol levels 30 minutes later.

Heart rate variability—how much the time between heart beats varies—has previously been tied to a sensitivity to social cues such as facial expressions. The scientists found that the men in the study who had higher baseline heart rate variability differed more in their physiological responses to the different types of smiles. These differences between people may fundamentally affect how they respond to social situations.

“Our results show that subtle differences in the way you make facial expressions while someone is talking to you can fundamentally change their experience, their body, and the way they feel like you’re evaluating them,” Martin says.

Further study will be needed to better understand how people vary in how they understand and respond to nonverbal social cues. Notably, women may tend to respond in different ways than men. They were excluded from this particular study because of potential measurement complications caused by oral contraceptives.

—by Harrison Wein, Ph.D.

Related Links

References: Functionally distinct smiles elicit different physiological responses in an evaluative context. Martin JD, Abercrombie HC, Gilboa-Schechtman E, Niedenthal PM. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 1;8(1):3558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21536-1. PMID: 29497068.

Funding: NIH’s National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); National Science Foundation; U.S.–Israeli Binational Science Foundation; and Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.

The Southern Maryland Chronicle is a local, small business entrusted to provide factual, unbiased reporting to the Southern Maryland Community. While we look to local businesses for advertising, we hope to keep that cost as low as possible in order to attract even the smallest of local businesses and help them get out to the public. We must also be able to pay employees(part-time and full-time), along with equipment, and website related things. We never want to make the Chronicle a “pay-wall” style news site.

To that end, we are looking to the community to offer donations. Whether it’s a one-time donation or you set up a reoccurring monthly donation. It is all appreciated. All donations at this time will be going to furthering the Chronicle through hiring individuals that have the same goals of providing fair, and unbiased news to the community. For now, donations will be going to a business PayPal account I have set-up for the Southern Maryland Chronicle, KDC Designs. All business transactions currently occur within this PayPal account. If you have any questions regarding this you can email me at

Thank you for all of your support and I hope to continue bringing Southern Maryland the best news possible for a very long time. — David M. Higgins II

© 2019 The Southern Maryland Chronicle. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.